Was Ichiro Suzuki a great leadoff man during the 2001-3 seasons?
by Cyril Morong
No. From 2001-3, Ichiro Suzuki had an OBP of .374. He averaged 41.44 stolen bases (SBs) per 162 games with 12.67 caught stealing (CS). Using the linear weights run values (invented by Pete Palmer) from the new Baseball Encyclopedia of .22 for a SB and -.38 for a CS, that works out to 4.3 BSR (base stealing runs). This would account for less than half a win per season. In my opinion, the data does not warrant calling him a great leadoff man over this time period. Others may call him great based on this evidence. But I think it is reasonable to say he was not great.
As of Sept. 11, 2004, his OBP was .414 with 34 SB and just 10 CS. Three or four years of this would make him a great leadoff hitter. Now he has probably been the best leadoff man these past 4 years, but when we look at the last 20 years or so later, he will not look so great. And being a leadoff man is not specialized in the way catching or playing SS is. Many players could leadoff without being a big detriment to their team. This is not true for catching or SS.
I show that his base stealing is only good compared to other players. I show that his OBP is good, but not great compared to other players. I created a "leadoff index" that ranks him high but not nearly as high as others. His extra bases per plate appearance and adjusted OPS are also not extraordinary. Five different leadoff men, from 1980-2002 had seasons with an Offensive winning percentage of 50 or more points greater than the one that Suzuki had in 2001. In total, 37 higher. There were 15 cases in the same time period of leadoff men having more BSR, a higher adjusted OPS and a higher OBP relative to the league average in a season than Suzuki did in 2001 ((3 non-leadoff men also accomplished this). Most of this I show in tables at the end of this paper. The 2001 Mariners would have scored just 5 fewer runs if Olerud had been their leadoff man (based on a simulation).
In the course of analyzing Suzuki, I compare him to some other leadoff men. If you think I left any important leadoff men out, please let me know.
Was
he a great leadoff man from 2001-3?
He ranked 10th, 14th and 30th in OBP in the AL, respectively, over the past three seasons. In 2002, with a .388 OBP (his highest of the three seasons), he was about 17% above the league average. Since 1960, this would rank him 349th for batting title qualifiers (in non-DH years or leagues, each player got compared to non-pitchers). I used the Lee Sinins Sabermetric Encyclopedia.
He would rank 127th all-time in OBP relative to the league average, if compared to all players with 5000 or more plate appearances. How does he compare to some well-known leadoff men? (again, many leadoff men are left out)
Player |
Ratio |
Henderson |
1.207 |
Bishop |
1.782 |
Huggins |
1.168 |
Ashburn |
1.168 |
Hack |
1.162 |
Raines |
1.156 |
Rose |
1.143 |
Butler |
1.142 |
Yost |
1.142 |
Dykstra |
1.133 |
Suzuki |
1.123 |
Henderson was 20.7% above the league average. I did not check all leadoff men in history. Just some that I knew batted leadoff fairly often. Some players here did sometimes bat in other positions. Again, this is relative to non-pitchers. In the case of Suzuki and Henderson, their league average gets raised because the DH is a little better than the average hitter in OBP. But I think this effect will be slight after checking a few years on Retrosheet (where I was able to check if some guys actually did leadoff).
In BSR, I ranked every player with at least 50 SBs from 1980-2002. Vince Coleman had the best, in 1986, with 18.22 (107 SBs, 14 CS). There were seven seasons of 14 or more, twice what Suzuki had in 2001, which was 7 (56 SBs, 14 CS). In this group, Suzuki’s 7 BSR were the 71st highest total.
I also looked at some select leadoff men in selected seasons from 1980 on and how they did in individual season. These included Boggs, Henderson, Raines, Butler, Molitor, and Dykstra. In most years for these players, at least 75% of their at-bats (ABs) were leading off. None were less than 33% (I did a rough estimate while going through Retrosheet). A season where Boggs, for example, had less than 33% of his ABs leading off was not included. Total of 42 seasons, so many leadoff hitters are not included in the ranking or comparisons.
I found at 28 seasons (with 300+ ABs) that had an OBP of .400 or higher, something Suzuki did not do before 2004. Just from these players, there were 40 seasons better than Suzuki’s .381 of 2001. I also counted 9 seasons of .420 or more by players who had at least 75% of their ABs leading off.
I also looked at adjusted OPS. OPS is OBP + slugging percentage (SLG). Adjusted OPS is relative to the league average and takes park effects into account. Suzuki had 128 in 2001. It is 31st among these 42 seasons. There were 9 seasons of 150 or more, with the highest being Henderson at 190 in 1990. He was almost exclusively a leadoff man. He had 5 seasons better than 150.
The three seasons where Raines had over 90% of his ABs leading off he had adjusted OPS of 155, 134, and 129. All better than what Suzuki had in 2001.
Dykstra had 3 seasons with an OBP over .400. His two best adjusted OPS years were 144 and 137, both better than Suzuki in 2001 (128).
Molitor in 1987 had an OBP of .438 and an adjusted OPS of 159, both well above Suzuki’s 2001 numbers. Molitor also had 6.1 BSR, close to Suzuki’s 7 of 2001.
Boggs in 1989 had 80% of his ABs leading off. His OBP was .430. His adjusted OPS was 141. In 1991, he had 77.7% of his ABs leading off. He a .421 OBP and a 138 adjusted OPS. In both years his OBP and adjusted OPS were well above Suzuki’s .381 and 128 of 2001. It is true that Suzuki scored a greater percentage of the time he reached base (due to his speed and stealing). But that partly depends on the hitters who follow you. The 1989 Red Sox batted .277 and slugged .403. In 1991, they had .269 and .401. The Mariners in 2001 batted .288 and slugged .445. So Suzuki had some help there.
Brett Butler went over .400 in OBP 3 times. He even had two seasons above 128 in adjusted OPS, what Suzuki had in 2001. Butler had seasons of 133 and 131.
In 2001, Suzuki had an OBP of .381 and 7 BSR. His OBP was 14% above the league average. Henderson had 9 seasons where he had both an OBP that was at least 20% better than the league average and more BSR than Suzuki had in 2001. In fact, Henderson had 2 seasons that more than doubled 7 BSR. In 1983 he had 16.54 while having an OBP 26.2% above the league average. In 1988 he had 15.52 BSR while his OBP was 21.6% above the league average.
In those three seasons where Raines had over 90% of his ABs leading off, he had the following BSR and relative OBP combinations: 11.98/23.4%, 14.48/18.4%, and 11.44/19.2%. Again, all much better than Suzuki had in 2001.
When it comes to great leadoff men, Henderson and Raines raised the bar very high. Only in 2004 is Ichiro Suzuki even approaching their achievements. During the 2001-3 seasons he did not achieve greatness in stealing or in getting on base. This is especially true when you look at some of the seasons by the others as well (Boggs, Dykstra, Molitor, Butler)
I almost forgot Craig Biggio. From 1996-2000, 72.3% of his ABs were leading off. His OBP was .389 over the whole period (Suzuki had .374 from 2001-3). Biggio averaged about 4 BSR per season, close to what Suzuki did over 2001-3. He had two seasons with an adjusted OPS in the 140s. His adjusted OPS over the 5 years was 123.4, close to Suzuki’s best season of 128 in 2001. In 1998, he had an OPB of .403 with 7.96 BSR and an adjusted OPS of 141. All better than Suzuki in 2001.
Kenny Lofton: In 1993, he had 10.1 BSR and his OBP (.408) was 21% above the league average. In 1994, he had 8.64 BSR and his OBP (.412) was 19.4% above the league average and his adjusted OPS was 143.
Chuck Knoblauch: In 1995, his OBP (.424) was 23.3% above the league average and his adjusted OPS was 137. In 1996, his OBP (.448) was 28% above the league average and his adjusted OPS was 142. In 1997, he had 9.84 BSR and his OBP (.390) was 15% above the league.(Again, Suzuki in 2001 had 7 BSR, and adjusted OPS of 128 and his OBP was 14.1% above the league average).
Has Suzuki been hurt by Safeco Field in OBP? Here are his OBPs for the three seasons:
home/road OBP
379/384
372/403
366/338
The simple average for home games is .372 and for road games it is .375. In 2002, the OBP in games at Safeco by all hitters was .328 (just a simple average of what the Mariner hitters got and the pitchers allowed). So his home OBP of .372 was 13.4% above that. In Mariner road games, the OBP was .335. His .403 is 20.3% above that. The average of those two is 16.85% better than average. Earlier I said his .388 in 2002 was 17% better than the league average and that this would be the 349th best year since 1960 for qualifiers.
In fact, here are the top 40 hitters in OBP from 2000-2002 with 1000 or more plate appearances. Suzuki would rank 38th if we gave him a .382 OBP (I would have used 2001-03, but my Sabermetric encyclopedia only goes up through 2002). Suzuki’s rank of 34 shown below only includes his 2001-2 seasons.
1 Barry Bonds .512
2 Jason Giambi .462
3 Todd Helton .441
4 Manny Ramirez .435
5 Larry Walker .429
6 Carlos Delgado .429
7 Brian Giles .428
8 Chipper Jones .422
9 Gary Sheffield .420
10 Jim Thome .419
11 Edgar Martinez .418
12 Sammy Sosa .415
13 Jim Edmonds .414
14 Lance Berkman .411
15 Jeff Bagwell .408
16 Bobby Abreu .407
17 Luis Gonzalez .407
18 Alex Rodriguez .403
19 Vladimir Guerrero .402
20 Bernie Williams .401
21 Mike Sweeney .399
22 John Olerud .399
23 Albert Pujols .399
24 Frank Thomas .396
25 Rafael Palmeiro .389
26 David Segui .389
27 Ryan Klesko .388
28 Derek Jeter .388
29 Nomar Garciaparra .388
30 Jeff Kent .387
31 J.D. Drew .387
32 Cliff Floyd .386
33 Jeremy Giambi .385
34 Ichiro Suzuki .385
35 Tim Salmon .384
36 Jorge Posada .384
37 Edgardo Alfonzo .383
38 Moises Alou .383
39 Ellis Burks .381
40 Mark Grace .381
What about comparing Suzuki to all those “select” leadoff men I mentioned? I do so in the table below.
Rank |
Player |
Freq |
YEAR |
PA |
SB |
CS |
OBP |
BSR |
ADD BB |
OBP INC |
ADJ OBP |
LG AVG |
Index |
1 |
Boggs |
33 |
1988 |
719 |
2 |
3 |
0.476 |
-0.7 |
-1.21 |
-0.002 |
0.474 |
0.324 |
1.464 |
2 |
Henderson |
75 |
1990 |
592 |
65 |
10 |
0.439 |
10.5 |
18.10 |
0.031 |
0.470 |
0.327 |
1.436 |
3 |
Henderson |
75 |
1983 |
621 |
108 |
19 |
0.414 |
16.5 |
28.52 |
0.046 |
0.460 |
0.328 |
1.402 |
4 |
Henderson |
75 |
1985 |
654 |
80 |
10 |
0.419 |
13.8 |
23.79 |
0.036 |
0.455 |
0.327 |
1.393 |
5 |
Molitor |
75 |
1987 |
537 |
45 |
10 |
0.438 |
6.1 |
10.52 |
0.020 |
0.458 |
0.333 |
1.374 |
6 |
Henderson |
75 |
1992 |
500 |
48 |
11 |
0.426 |
6.38 |
11.00 |
0.022 |
0.448 |
0.328 |
1.366 |
7 |
Boggs |
33 |
1986 |
689 |
0 |
4 |
0.453 |
-1.52 |
-2.62 |
-0.004 |
0.449 |
0.330 |
1.361 |
8 |
Raines |
75 |
1981 |
363 |
71 |
11 |
0.391 |
11.4 |
19.72 |
0.054 |
0.445 |
0.328 |
1.358 |
9 |
Henderson |
75 |
1980 |
716 |
100 |
26 |
0.420 |
12.1 |
20.90 |
0.029 |
0.449 |
0.331 |
1.357 |
10 |
Henderson |
75 |
1993 |
609 |
53 |
8 |
0.432 |
8.62 |
14.86 |
0.024 |
0.456 |
0.337 |
1.354 |
11 |
Henderson |
75 |
1989 |
674 |
77 |
14 |
0.411 |
11.6 |
20.03 |
0.030 |
0.441 |
0.326 |
1.352 |
12 |
Henderson |
75 |
1988 |
644 |
93 |
13 |
0.394 |
15.5 |
26.76 |
0.042 |
0.436 |
0.324 |
1.344 |
13 |
Henderson |
75 |
1987 |
440 |
41 |
8 |
0.423 |
5.98 |
10.31 |
0.023 |
0.446 |
0.333 |
1.341 |
14 |
Raines |
33 |
1987 |
627 |
50 |
5 |
0.429 |
9.1 |
15.69 |
0.025 |
0.454 |
0.339 |
1.339 |
15 |
Raines |
33 |
1986 |
663 |
70 |
9 |
0.413 |
12 |
20.66 |
0.031 |
0.444 |
0.332 |
1.338 |
16 |
Raines |
75 |
1985 |
662 |
70 |
9 |
0.405 |
12 |
20.66 |
0.031 |
0.436 |
0.328 |
1.330 |
17 |
Henderson |
75 |
1982 |
656 |
130 |
42 |
0.398 |
12.6 |
21.79 |
0.033 |
0.431 |
0.328 |
1.315 |
18 |
Henderson |
75 |
1981 |
493 |
56 |
22 |
0.408 |
3.96 |
6.83 |
0.014 |
0.422 |
0.321 |
1.314 |
19 |
Boggs |
75 |
1989 |
742 |
2 |
6 |
0.430 |
-1.84 |
-3.17 |
-0.004 |
0.426 |
0.326 |
1.306 |
20 |
Dykstra |
75 |
1990 |
689 |
33 |
5 |
0.418 |
5.36 |
9.24 |
0.013 |
0.431 |
0.331 |
1.303 |
21 |
Henderson |
75 |
1984 |
596 |
66 |
18 |
0.399 |
7.68 |
13.24 |
0.022 |
0.421 |
0.326 |
1.292 |
22 |
Raines |
33 |
1984 |
715 |
75 |
10 |
0.393 |
12.7 |
21.90 |
0.031 |
0.424 |
0.328 |
1.292 |
23 |
Raines |
75 |
1983 |
718 |
90 |
14 |
0.393 |
14.5 |
24.97 |
0.035 |
0.428 |
0.332 |
1.288 |
24 |
Butler |
33 |
1992 |
652 |
41 |
21 |
0.413 |
1.04 |
1.79 |
0.003 |
0.416 |
0.325 |
1.279 |
25 |
Raines |
75 |
1989 |
618 |
41 |
9 |
0.395 |
5.6 |
9.66 |
0.016 |
0.411 |
0.321 |
1.279 |
26 |
Boggs |
75 |
1991 |
641 |
1 |
2 |
0.421 |
-0.54 |
-0.93 |
-0.001 |
0.420 |
0.329 |
1.275 |
27 |
Dykstra |
75 |
1993 |
773 |
37 |
12 |
0.420 |
3.58 |
6.17 |
0.008 |
0.428 |
0.336 |
1.274 |
28 |
Henderson |
75 |
1991 |
578 |
58 |
18 |
0.400 |
5.92 |
10.21 |
0.018 |
0.418 |
0.329 |
1.269 |
29 |
Boggs |
75 |
1984 |
718 |
3 |
2 |
0.407 |
-0.1 |
-0.17 |
0.000 |
0.407 |
0.326 |
1.248 |
30 |
Butler |
75 |
1988 |
671 |
43 |
20 |
0.393 |
1.86 |
3.21 |
0.005 |
0.398 |
0.320 |
1.243 |
31 |
Butler |
75 |
1994 |
489 |
27 |
8 |
0.411 |
2.9 |
5.00 |
0.010 |
0.421 |
0.342 |
1.232 |
32 |
Henderson |
75 |
1996 |
602 |
37 |
15 |
0.410 |
2.44 |
4.21 |
0.007 |
0.417 |
0.339 |
1.230 |
33 |
Butler |
75 |
1990 |
725 |
51 |
19 |
0.397 |
4 |
6.90 |
0.010 |
0.407 |
0.331 |
1.228 |
34 |
Molitor |
75 |
1991 |
749 |
19 |
8 |
0.399 |
1.14 |
1.97 |
0.003 |
0.402 |
0.329 |
1.221 |
35 |
Suzuki |
75 |
2001 |
734 |
56 |
14 |
0.391 |
7 |
12.07 |
0.016 |
0.407 |
0.334 |
1.218 |
36 |
Butler |
75 |
1991 |
726 |
38 |
28 |
0.401 |
-2.28 |
-3.93 |
-0.005 |
0.396 |
0.325 |
1.217 |
37 |
Henderson |
75 |
1995 |
486 |
32 |
10 |
0.407 |
3.24 |
5.59 |
0.011 |
0.418 |
0.344 |
1.217 |
38 |
Butler |
75 |
1987 |
616 |
33 |
16 |
0.399 |
1.18 |
2.03 |
0.003 |
0.402 |
0.333 |
1.208 |
39 |
Dykstra |
75 |
1994 |
386 |
15 |
4 |
0.404 |
1.78 |
3.07 |
0.008 |
0.412 |
0.342 |
1.205 |
40 |
Boggs |
33 |
1995 |
541 |
1 |
1 |
0.412 |
-0.16 |
-0.28 |
-0.001 |
0.411 |
0.344 |
1.196 |
41 |
Boggs |
33 |
1990 |
713 |
0 |
0 |
0.386 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.000 |
0.386 |
0.327 |
1.180 |
42 |
Boggs |
33 |
1992 |
598 |
1 |
3 |
0.353 |
-0.92 |
-1.59 |
-0.003 |
0.350 |
0.328 |
1.068 |
Freq means how frequently the guy batted leadoff. 33 means at least 33% of the time and 75 means at least 75% of the time. I calculated how many additional walks a guy would have to get to equal the run value of his SB and CS (the BSR). I assumed that he could change outs into walks, so that an added walk has a value of .33 and one less out means you don’t get a -.25, so you add another .25 (using the linear weights values from Pete Palmer). So you add .58 for each additional walk. I added enough walks so that the increased run value from those walks would equal each guy’s BSR (see the ADD BB column). Then I figured how much those walks would increase his OBP (see OBP INC). The new OBP is the ADJ OBP column.
For Suzuki, you will notice that he has a .391 OBP for 2001, higher than what he really had. I adjusted it upwards to reflect his lower OBP at home in Safeco Field.
Then I divided each guy’s adjusted OBP by the league OBP (for National League hitters, I used non-pitchers only to get the average, thanks again to the Lee Sinins Sabermetric Encyclopedia). That number is called the INDEX. Then I ranked them. Suzuki is 35th among these 42 leadoff men, which of course does not include all leadoff men from 1980-2003. The average index was 1.29, so he was well below that in 2001. Now most of these guys did not get much help from their home parks (Boggs is the exception). If they did, please let me know.
I also looked at how many extra-bases these guys got on 2Bs,
3Bs, and HRs per PA. I did this because a leadoff man does not just have to get
himself on, but get into scoring position.
Rank |
Player |
YEAR |
XB per PA |
1 |
Henderson |
1990 |
0.208 |
2 |
Molitor |
1987 |
0.184 |
3 |
Henderson |
1985 |
0.168 |
4 |
Henderson |
1987 |
0.168 |
5 |
Raines |
1987 |
0.166 |
6 |
Dykstra |
1993 |
0.146 |
7 |
Henderson |
1993 |
0.146 |
8 |
Molitor |
1991 |
0.146 |
9 |
Henderson |
1984 |
0.139 |
10 |
Henderson |
1992 |
0.138 |
11 |
Raines |
1985 |
0.134 |
12 |
Dykstra |
1994 |
0.132 |
13 |
Henderson |
1991 |
0.126 |
14 |
Raines |
1986 |
0.124 |
15 |
Henderson |
1995 |
0.123 |
16 |
Raines |
1981 |
0.116 |
17 |
Raines |
1983 |
0.113 |
18 |
Butler |
1994 |
0.112 |
19 |
Raines |
1984 |
0.112 |
20 |
Butler |
1987 |
0.110 |
21 |
Raines |
1989 |
0.110 |
22 |
Boggs |
1991 |
0.109 |
23 |
Boggs |
1986 |
0.109 |
24 |
Henderson |
1983 |
0.106 |
25 |
Henderson |
1981 |
0.101 |
26 |
Boggs |
1990 |
0.101 |
27 |
Henderson |
1989 |
0.101 |
28 |
Suzuki |
2001 |
0.101 |
29 |
Boggs |
1988 |
0.100 |
30 |
Boggs |
1989 |
0.100 |
31 |
Dykstra |
1990 |
0.099 |
32 |
Henderson |
1982 |
0.095 |
33 |
Butler |
1988 |
0.094 |
34 |
Boggs |
1992 |
0.085 |
35 |
Boggs |
1995 |
0.083 |
36 |
Henderson |
1988 |
0.081 |
37 |
Henderson |
1996 |
0.080 |
38 |
Henderson |
1980 |
0.080 |
39 |
Boggs |
1984 |
0.079 |
40 |
Butler |
1992 |
0.069 |
41 |
Butler |
1990 |
0.065 |
42 |
Butler |
1991 |
0.040 |
Notice again that Suzuki ranks in the bottom half. The average was .114 for these guys, so Suzuki was below average. A surprise, considering how fast he is and all the room in the outfield at Safeco.
Here is a ranking of adjusted OPS. Suzuki ranks 31.
Rank |
Player |
YEAR |
ADJ OPS |
1 |
Henderson |
1990 |
190 |
2 |
Boggs |
1988 |
165 |
3 |
Molitor |
1987 |
159 |
4 |
Henderson |
1985 |
159 |
5 |
Boggs |
1986 |
156 |
6 |
Henderson |
1992 |
156 |
7 |
Raines |
1985 |
155 |
8 |
Henderson |
1981 |
152 |
9 |
Henderson |
1993 |
150 |
10 |
Raines |
1987 |
148 |
11 |
Molitor |
1991 |
148 |
12 |
Henderson |
1984 |
147 |
13 |
Raines |
1986 |
146 |
14 |
Henderson |
1987 |
144 |
15 |
Dykstra |
1993 |
144 |
16 |
Boggs |
1989 |
141 |
17 |
Raines |
1984 |
140 |
18 |
Henderson |
1983 |
139 |
19 |
Boggs |
1991 |
138 |
20 |
Dykstra |
1990 |
137 |
21 |
Henderson |
1980 |
136 |
22 |
Henderson |
1991 |
136 |
23 |
Butler |
1988 |
134 |
24 |
Raines |
1981 |
134 |
25 |
Butler |
1994 |
133 |
26 |
Henderson |
1989 |
133 |
27 |
Raines |
1989 |
132 |
28 |
Butler |
1992 |
131 |
29 |
Henderson |
1995 |
130 |
30 |
Raines |
1983 |
129 |
31 |
Suzuki |
2001 |
128 |
32 |
Henderson |
1988 |
125 |
33 |
Boggs |
1984 |
123 |
34 |
Butler |
1990 |
122 |
35 |
Henderson |
1982 |
121 |
36 |
Boggs |
1995 |
120 |
37 |
Boggs |
1990 |
120 |
38 |
Butler |
1987 |
119 |
39 |
Dykstra |
1994 |
116 |
40 |
Butler |
1991 |
114 |
41 |
Henderson |
1996 |
108 |
42 |
Boggs |
1992 |
94 |
The table below shows all leadoff men from 1980-2002 who had a higher Offensive Winning Percentage (OWP) than Suzuki had in 2001 (.687). Offensive winning percentage tells us what winning percentage a team would have if all 9 batters were just like the one in question and the team gave up an average number of runs. It is a stat invented by Bill James. It takes stealing into account. The OWPs here come from the Lee Sinins Sabermetric Encyclopedia, so they are park adjusted. LO AB is the number of leadoff at-bats a guy gets. Leadoff % was the percent of their at-bats that were leadoff. I could not find what percentage of at-bats were leadoff for Henderson, Dykstra and Lofton in 1993. But it is likely that they batted leadoff most of the time. The number with a star is how many at-bats they had actually leading off an inning (from the 1994 Great American Baseball Stat Book). Leadoff at-bats from some players came from Retrosheet. Others came from various version of the STATS, INC Player Profiles books.
There were 33 cases of a higher OWP than .687 for guys who had at least 50% of their at-bats leading off. There were 15 seasons with an OWP 50 or more points above Suzuki’s 2001 OWP of .687. Five different players achieved this.
Rank |
Player |
YEAR |
OWP |
LO AB |
Other AB |
Leadoff % |
1 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1990 |
0.859 |
485 |
4 |
99.18 |
2 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1985 |
0.807 |
546 |
1 |
99.82 |
3 |
Paul
Molitor |
1987 |
0.790 |
425 |
40 |
91.40 |
4 |
Tim
Raines |
1985 |
0.777 |
567 |
8 |
98.61 |
5 |
Tim
Raines |
1986 |
0.773 |
288 |
292 |
49.66 |
6 |
Wade
Boggs |
1986 |
0.770 |
214 |
366 |
36.90 |
7 |
Wade
Boggs |
1988 |
0.767 |
349 |
235 |
59.76 |
8 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1993 |
0.760 |
185* |
|
|
9 |
Tim
Raines |
1984 |
0.757 |
362 |
260 |
58.20 |
10 |
Craig
Biggio |
1997 |
0.753 |
614 |
5 |
99.19 |
11 |
Tim
Raines |
1987 |
0.744 |
219 |
311 |
41.32 |
12 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1981 |
0.742 |
422 |
1 |
99.76 |
13 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1984 |
0.737 |
500 |
2 |
99.60 |
14 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1983 |
0.732 |
505 |
9 |
98.25 |
15 |
Brady
Anderson |
1996 |
0.731 |
402 |
177 |
69.43 |
16 |
Tim
Raines |
1981 |
0.731 |
313 |
0 |
100.00 |
17 |
Craig
Biggio |
1994 |
0.727 |
150 |
287 |
34.32 |
18 |
Lenny
Dykstra |
1990 |
0.726 |
588 |
2 |
99.66 |
19 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1980 |
0.725 |
591 |
0 |
100.00 |
20 |
Kal
Daniels |
1990 |
0.723 |
156 |
339 |
31.52 |
21 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1988 |
0.720 |
553 |
1 |
99.82 |
22 |
Chuck
Knoblauch |
1996 |
0.716 |
577 |
1 |
99.83 |
23 |
Kenny
Lofton |
1994 |
0.716 |
458 |
1 |
99.78 |
24 |
Lenny
Dykstra |
1993 |
0.714 |
260* |
|
|
25 |
Willie
Randolph |
1980 |
0.714 |
513 |
0 |
100.00 |
26 |
Brett
Butler |
1994 |
0.712 |
354 |
63 |
84.89 |
27 |
Craig
Biggio |
1998 |
0.709 |
644 |
2 |
99.69 |
28 |
Darin
Erstad |
2000 |
0.704 |
675 |
1 |
99.85 |
29 |
Kenny
Lofton |
1993 |
0.704 |
227* |
|
|
30 |
Paul
Molitor |
1991 |
0.700 |
652 |
13 |
98.05 |
31 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1989 |
0.699 |
539 |
2 |
99.63 |
32 |
Wade
Boggs |
1989 |
0.699 |
497 |
124 |
80.03 |
33 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1991 |
0.698 |
464 |
6 |
98.72 |
34 |
Tim
Raines |
1983 |
0.692 |
604 |
11 |
98.21 |
35 |
Tim
Raines |
1992 |
0.692 |
345 |
206 |
62.61 |
36 |
Wade
Boggs |
1991 |
0.691 |
353 |
266 |
57.03 |
37 |
Brett
Butler |
1988 |
0.690 |
566 |
2 |
99.65 |
38 |
Ichiro
Suzuki |
2001 |
0.687 |
685 |
7 |
98.99 |
In the table below are the cased of seasons in which leadoff men bested all three of the following by Suzuki in 2001: His BSR of 7, his adjusted OPS of 128 and his OBP relative to the league average of 1.14.
Player |
YEAR |
SB |
CS |
BSR |
ADJ OPS |
OBP |
LG OBP |
Rel OBP |
Rickey
Henderson |
1983 |
108 |
19 |
16.54 |
139 |
0.414 |
0.326 |
1.27 |
Tim
Raines |
1983 |
90 |
14 |
14.48 |
129 |
0.393 |
0.332 |
1.18 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1985 |
80 |
10 |
13.80 |
159 |
0.419 |
0.324 |
1.29 |
Tim
Raines |
1984 |
75 |
10 |
12.70 |
140 |
0.393 |
0.328 |
1.20 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1980 |
100 |
26 |
12.12 |
136 |
0.42 |
0.328 |
1.28 |
Tim
Raines |
1985 |
70 |
9 |
11.98 |
155 |
0.405 |
0.328 |
1.23 |
Tim
Raines |
1986 |
70 |
9 |
11.98 |
146 |
0.413 |
0.332 |
1.24 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1989 |
77 |
14 |
11.62 |
133 |
0.411 |
0.326 |
1.26 |
Tim
Raines |
1981 |
71 |
11 |
11.44 |
134 |
0.391 |
0.328 |
1.19 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1990 |
65 |
10 |
10.50 |
190 |
0.439 |
0.327 |
1.34 |
Tim
Raines |
1987 |
50 |
5 |
9.10 |
148 |
0.429 |
0.339 |
1.27 |
Kenny
Lofton |
1994 |
60 |
12 |
8.64 |
143 |
0.412 |
0.331 |
1.24 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1993 |
53 |
8 |
8.62 |
150 |
0.432 |
0.337 |
1.28 |
Craig
Biggio |
1998 |
50 |
8 |
7.96 |
141 |
0.403 |
0.339 |
1.19 |
Rickey
Henderson |
1984 |
66 |
18 |
7.68 |
147 |
0.399 |
0.327 |
1.22 |
Ichiro
Suzuki |
2001 |
56 |
14 |
7.00 |
128 |
0.381 |
0.334 |
1.14 |
There were also three non-leadoff men since 1980 who topped Suzuki in all three of BSR, ADJ OPS and Rel OBP. Eric Davis (1987) had 8.72, 1.177 and 152. Tony Gwynn (1987) had 7.76, 1.32 and 160. Barry Larkin (1995) had 9.32, 1.159 and 133. Again, the league average OBP was for non-pitchers.
Finally, I also ran a simulation of the 2001 Mariners Lineup with Suzuki batting first and then again with John Olerud batting first instead of Suzuki (I used the Star Simulator).
The Mariners with Suzuki batting first scored 921 runs per 162 games (162,000 games played). Suzuki hit .350 with a .378 OBP and a .457 SLG, very close to his real numbers. He stole 61 bases and was caught 15 times. He scored 134 runs, 7 more than in real life, but only 3 more per 162 games. The Mariners in real life scored 927 runs, so the simulation worked well for them. The simulated Mariners hit .292 with a.362 OBP and a .458 SLG. The real numbers were .288-.360-.445. Their lineup was
Ichiro Suzuki
Mark McLemore
Bret Boone
Edgar Martinez
John Olerud
Mike Cameron
Dan Wilson
Carlos Guillen
David Bell
When Olerud replaced Suzuki as leadoff man (and batted 5th as well), the Mariners scored 916 runs, just a little less than with Suzuki. Olerud batted .302 with a .401 OBP and a .470 SLG. 4 SB and 1 CS. The Mariners still batted .287 with a .460 SLG. But their OBP went up to .365. The 5th place Olerud had similar numbers to the leadoff Olerud.
So why would Suzuki be a great leadoff man if he could only add 5 runs above what you could get with John Olerud?